Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

subX.edit.txt #115

Closed
mainux opened this issue Nov 8, 2017 · 7 comments · Fixed by #623
Closed

subX.edit.txt #115

mainux opened this issue Nov 8, 2017 · 7 comments · Fixed by #623

Comments

@mainux
Copy link

mainux commented Nov 8, 2017

Hi, sorry for being a newbie, but is there any example on how to modify the subX.edit.txt?

I'd like to put my data in BIDS format but I was not able yet to understand how.

Thanks in advance,

Maite

@satra
Copy link
Member

satra commented Nov 8, 2017

@mainux - to create bids structures you will need to create your own heuristic file. see the README in the repo for how to do that - there is a presentation that guides you through to BIDS conversion. you can also try to adapt from one of the existing heuristics.

@mgxd - i think it would be good now to have more formal documentation using readthedocs.

@yarikoptic
Copy link
Member

Or for the future studies name your sequences in the scanner in a way already supported by one of the heuristics

@satra
Copy link
Member

satra commented Nov 8, 2017

@yarikoptic - good point - we should make that clear in the documentation.

retrospective studies:
construct heuristic

prospective studies:
if you name your protocols in the following manner, you can use the default heuristic.

@mgxd mgxd added this to the future milestone Nov 8, 2017
@mgxd mgxd added the doc label Nov 8, 2017
yarikoptic added a commit to dbic/heudiconv that referenced this issue Jan 25, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link

🚀 Issue was released in v0.12.0 🚀

@github-actions
Copy link

🚀 Issue was released in v0.12.0 🚀

2 similar comments
@github-actions
Copy link

🚀 Issue was released in v0.12.0 🚀

@github-actions
Copy link

🚀 Issue was released in v0.12.0 🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants