Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

102 review and change information architecture #144

Draft
wants to merge 15 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

vickytnz
Copy link
Contributor

@vickytnz vickytnz commented Nov 21, 2024

Starter of what this could look like. 5 is a bit of an awkward number but in the absence of being able to implement the menu it's a good reference.

home page with 5 landing page sections - get started, guides, what's new support, contribution

This isn't entirely ready as we need to make a lot of pages - and I'd still like to implement a proper menu so that the home page can just promote the benefits of the kit - but could work as a placeholder to work towards (separately, I'm not sure if we need more things in the footer like the OGL licence).

@vickytnz vickytnz linked an issue Nov 21, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
@frankieroberto frankieroberto temporarily deployed to nhs-prototyp-102-review-qjfmju November 21, 2024 22:18 Inactive
@vickytnz vickytnz temporarily deployed to nhs-prototyp-102-review-qjfmju November 21, 2024 22:29 Inactive
@vickytnz
Copy link
Contributor Author

Alt with updates page in footer and pages changed to half - this might be more achievable for now

page with sections - get started, guides, support, and contribute with footer including updates

@vickytnz vickytnz temporarily deployed to nhs-prototyp-102-review-qjfmju November 23, 2024 18:31 Inactive
@vickytnz
Copy link
Contributor Author

Option with button - though this has required some custom css since for some reason the button won't show properly

page with get started button and 3 steps

@vickytnz vickytnz temporarily deployed to nhs-prototyp-102-review-qjfmju November 23, 2024 19:01 Inactive
@vickytnz
Copy link
Contributor Author

option with what's new
page with what's new section

@vickytnz vickytnz temporarily deployed to nhs-prototyp-102-review-qjfmju November 23, 2024 19:10 Inactive
@frankieroberto frankieroberto temporarily deployed to nhs-prototyp-add-detail-hj1owb November 23, 2024 19:19 Inactive
@vickytnz vickytnz added the Content Improvements or additions to documentation label Nov 24, 2024
@vickytnz vickytnz temporarily deployed to nhs-prototyp-102-review-qjfmju November 24, 2024 14:00 Inactive
@vickytnz vickytnz temporarily deployed to nhs-prototyp-102-review-qjfmju November 24, 2024 14:03 Inactive
@vickytnz vickytnz temporarily deployed to nhs-prototyp-102-review-qjfmju November 27, 2024 13:38 Inactive
@vickytnz vickytnz temporarily deployed to nhs-prototyp-102-review-qjfmju November 27, 2024 13:44 Inactive
@vickytnz
Copy link
Contributor Author

Page is continuing to iterate to have the button and what's new text

I'd still like the bottom part to be about the value of the kit #50 but that content is still waiting and I also wonder if we need to have a section entirely in white rather than grey with cards on it?

page iwth get started button and guides and support

@frankieroberto
Copy link
Contributor

Not quite convinced of the tag component for "What’s new" (the tag component gets overused I think!) - however about a plain heading instead to match the other cards?

Could also list some other things in the box which aren’t just the most recent release?

Quick sketch:

Screenshot 2024-11-27 at 16 27 42

@vickytnz
Copy link
Contributor Author

Not quite convinced of the tag component for "What’s new" (the tag component gets overused I think!) - however about a plain heading instead to match the other cards?

Could also list some other things in the box which aren’t just the most recent release?

Quick sketch:

Screenshot 2024-11-27 at 16 27 42

Yeah fair enough and tbh trying to get the tag to work involved some contorting of code which is probably never good!

Defo this could be a starting point while we build up the benefits (which I think is what should actually replace the sections underneath it)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Content Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Review and change information architecture
2 participants