Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Question: CMake or Waf? #348

Closed
bradh opened this issue Sep 15, 2020 · 1 comment
Closed

Question: CMake or Waf? #348

bradh opened this issue Sep 15, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@bradh
Copy link

bradh commented Sep 15, 2020

It looks like PDF manual only covers waf, but more recent work seems to be on CMake. Which is preferred?
@JDanielSmith
Copy link
Contributor

CMake is probably preferred now as it has seen more recent attention and nobody uses "waf" much anymore.

kaydoh pushed a commit to kaydoh/six-library that referenced this issue Feb 9, 2022
@JonathanMeans
Squashed 'externals/coda-oss/' changes from 8995cd2c6..c098db31b
57a4395 
c098db31b Merge pull request ngageoint#351 from mdaus/numpy_wscript_cleanup
cb54ae83c Formatting, linting fixes
16bdc9c52 Merge pull request ngageoint#350 from mdaus/install_testcase_header
9215247c9 Install TestCase.h
b8f7f9219 Fix misc. warnings and formatting
7222982be Merge pull request ngageoint#348 from mdaus/better_numpy_check
8baf53240 Walk back breaking change to numpy check
ee91e5ef7 Merge pull request ngageoint#347 from mdaus/better_numpy_check
ef1eb332a Extract function
e23022568 Remove warning
a60bd9ccf Fix WSL build

git-subtree-dir: externals/coda-oss
git-subtree-split: c098db31bd865b726006ad7643acfbd4a463dcbc
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@bradh @JDanielSmith