-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Issue 106 #114
Issue 106 #114
Conversation
|
@apeltzer @atrigila We wont be migrating these modules to nf-core for now, as I was told they weren't good candidates since they aren't based on a tool but on a single script which is only hosted in the pipeline. |
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ process COMPUTE_GENE_SCORES { | |||
def args = task.ext.args ?: '' | |||
|
|||
""" | |||
compute_gene_scores.R $geneset_yaml $counts $args | |||
compute_gene_scores.R $gene_score_yaml $normalized_counts $args |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Something like this can make it easier to read in the log :)
compute_gene_scores.R $gene_score_yaml $normalized_counts $args | |
compute_gene_scores.R \\ | |
$gene_score_yaml \\ | |
$args \\ | |
$normalized_counts |
@@ -20,7 +19,7 @@ process CREATE_GENE_HEATMAP { | |||
def args = task.ext.args ?: '' | |||
|
|||
""" | |||
compute_gene_heatmap.R $annotated_counts $counts $heatmap_genes_to_filter $args | |||
compute_gene_heatmap.R $annotated_endo_data $normalized_counts $heatmap_genes_to_filter $args |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Something like this can make it easier to read in the log :)
compute_gene_heatmap.R $annotated_endo_data $normalized_counts $heatmap_genes_to_filter $args | |
compute_gene_heatmap.R \\ | |
$annotated_endo_data \\ | |
$normalized_counts \\ | |
$args \\ | |
$heatmap_genes_to_filter |
// | ||
// MODULE: Compute gene-count heatmap for MultiQC report based on annotated (ENDO) counts | ||
// | ||
if(!params.skip_heatmap){ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we can't have params
inside subworkflows now. They should be only in the main workflow. There was a guideline somewhere written by Ben but I can't find it now.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Makes sense, if this was an nf-core subworkflow this would be an issue. I don't think we will be migrating this subworkflow anytime soon, but since I already formatted it all, Ill do this too.
@atrigila all set 😄 |
PR checklist
nf-core lint
).nextflow run . -profile test,docker --outdir <OUTDIR>
).nextflow run . -profile debug,test,docker --outdir <OUTDIR>
).docs/usage.md
is updated.docs/output.md
is updated.CHANGELOG.md
is updated.README.md
is updated (including new tool citations and authors/contributors).