Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add more time for DamageProfiler on large ref genomes #176

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Apr 10, 2019
Merged

Add more time for DamageProfiler on large ref genomes #176

merged 5 commits into from
Apr 10, 2019

Conversation

apeltzer
Copy link
Member

This should address #173 as it requires more runtime for large reference genomes!

PR checklist

  • This comment contains a description of changes (with reason)
  • If you've fixed a bug or added code that should be tested, add tests!
  • If necessary, also make a PR on the nf-core/eager branch on the nf-core/test-datasets repo
  • Ensure the test suite passes (nextflow run . -profile test,docker).
  • Make sure your code lints (nf-core lint .).
  • Documentation in docs is updated
  • CHANGELOG.md is updated
  • README.md is updated

@jfy133 jfy133 self-requested a review April 10, 2019 14:49
jfy133
jfy133 approved these changes Apr 10, 2019
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@jfy133 jfy133 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You are a go with #173

@apeltzer apeltzer changed the base branch from master to dev April 10, 2019 18:02
@apeltzer apeltzer merged commit f79bc86 into nf-core:dev Apr 10, 2019
@apeltzer apeltzer deleted the damageprofiler-more branch April 10, 2019 18:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@jfy133 jfy133 jfy133 approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@apeltzer @jfy133