Special case GISAID EPI ISL and Genbank accession #850
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This looks for node attr `gisaid_epi_isl` and puts it in the hover box.
If `gisaid_epi_isl` or `genbank_accession` exist as node attrs, these preempt normal use of `accession` and `url`.
includes comment to indicate the special behavior introduced during nCoV response
to indicate the special nature of `gisaid_epi_isl`
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We want the ability to have accessions for viruses that are in both GISAID and Genbank. This PR watches for nodes with attrs
gisaid_epi_islandgenbank_accessionand treats them separately from the normalaccessionandurllogic.GISAID EPI ISL gets a hover element, while both GISAID EPI ISL and Genbank accession get click elements.