Show labels for subtree root nodes #1503
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This commit is related to the recent PR #1501 which hid (non-aa) labels depending on their in-view tip-fraction. Here if the label is on the root of a subtree then we always show it (unless the label is "aa" as these can be very long).
|
Good call. Definitely agree with this addition. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This commit is related to the recent PR #1501 which hid (non-aa) labels
depending on their in-view tip-fraction. Here if the label is on the
root of a subtree then we always show it (unless the label is "aa" as
these can be very long).
Without this change, when exploding by "emerging lineage" only BA.1.1 would be labelled in the following screenshot (when not exploded, then only BA.1.1 is labelled, as per #1501)