Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Do not run xcrun on non-Mac systems #3178

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 6, 2024
Merged

Do not run xcrun on non-Mac systems #3178

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 6, 2024

Conversation

JCGoran
Copy link
Contributor

@JCGoran JCGoran commented Nov 6, 2024

Removes the annoying xcrun: No such file or directory message on Linux.

Removes the annoying `xcrun: No such file or directory` message
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Nov 6, 2024

Copy link

✔️ c0f30a7 -> Azure artifacts URL

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 6, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 67.06%. Comparing base (68b193d) to head (c0f30a7).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #3178   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   67.06%   67.06%           
=======================================
  Files         571      571           
  Lines      111318   111318           
=======================================
  Hits        74656    74656           
  Misses      36662    36662           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@alkino alkino merged commit 1b23280 into master Nov 6, 2024
36 checks passed
@alkino alkino deleted the jelic/add_xcrun_check branch November 6, 2024 16:05
JCGoran added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2024
Removes the annoying `xcrun: No such file or directory` message
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants