Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(deps): update dependency lodash to v4.17.21 #1219

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 10, 2021

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Feb 20, 2021

WhiteSource Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
lodash (source) 4.17.20 -> 4.17.21 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

lodash/lodash

v4.17.21

Compare Source


Renovate configuration

📅 Schedule: At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻️ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by WhiteSource Renovate. View repository job log here.

@vegerot
Copy link

vegerot commented Mar 4, 2021

This is blocking our release of our application. Prioritizing this PR would be appreciated

@ian0cordova
Copy link

This is blocking our release of our application. Prioritizing this PR would be appreciated

This package causes security scans to fail.

More details here:

Overview lodash is a modern JavaScript utility library delivering modularity, performance, & extras. Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Command Injection via template. ### PoC var _ = require('lodash'); _.template('', { variable: '){console.log(process.env)}; with(obj' })() ## Remediation Upgrade lodash to version 4.17.21 or higher. ## References - GitHub Commit - Vulnerable Code

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants