Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

nvim: support named return on Batch methods #90

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 31, 2020
Merged

Conversation

zchee
Copy link
Member

@zchee zchee commented Dec 31, 2020

Support named return on Batch methods.

@zchee zchee self-assigned this Dec 31, 2020
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 31, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #90 (73ff88d) into master (5df923d) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 24.2%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #90   +/-   ##
======================================
  Coverage    60.6%   60.6%           
======================================
  Files          12      12           
  Lines        2079    2079           
======================================
  Hits         1260    1260           
  Misses        684     684           
  Partials      135     135           
Flag Coverage Δ
linux-1.13 60.6% <24.2%> (ø)
linux-1.14 60.6% <24.2%> (ø)
linux-1.15 60.6% <24.2%> (ø)
macos-1.13 60.6% <24.2%> (ø)
macos-1.14 60.6% <24.2%> (ø)
macos-1.15 60.6% <24.2%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
nvim/api.go 35.0% <24.2%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 5df923d...73ff88d. Read the comment docs.

@zchee zchee force-pushed the nvim-batch-named branch 5 times, most recently from f0dc4c7 to 73ff88d Compare December 31, 2020 21:14
@zchee zchee merged commit 73ff88d into master Dec 31, 2020
@zchee zchee deleted the nvim-batch-named branch December 31, 2020 21:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant