Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Move] Part-7 Classes into Different Library - Neo.Extensions #3446

Merged
merged 39 commits into from
Nov 29, 2024

Conversation

cschuchardt88
Copy link
Member

Description

Reorganized and move classes from neo library to neo.extensions library.

Fixed problems and warnings that occurred. Along with naming violations.

Change Log

  • Moved methods from Neo.VM.Helper class
  • Added ScriptBuilderExtensions class
  • Added using statement
  • Fixed typo with StringExtensions class and filename
  • Fixed unit tests

Type of change

  • Optimization (the change is only an optimization)
  • Style (the change is only a code style for better maintenance or standard purpose)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • This change requires a documentation update

How Has This Been Tested?

  • Unit Testing

image

Checklist:

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have performed a self-review of my code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules

cschuchardt88 and others added 30 commits July 2, 2024 04:46
…`, `AssemblyExtensions`, `StringExtensdions`

Deleted `Helper.cs` file
@cschuchardt88 cschuchardt88 added the Blocked This issue can't be worked at the moment label Aug 3, 2024
@cschuchardt88 cschuchardt88 requested review from shargon and Jim8y August 3, 2024 22:17
Comment on lines 18 to 28
public static void Remove<T>(this HashSet<T> set, ISet<T> other)
{
if (set.Count > other.Count)
{
set.ExceptWith(other);
}
else
{
set.RemoveWhere(u => other.Contains(u));
}
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

( Does set.Remove(other) have any difference from set.ExceptWith(other), even when set.Count <= other.Count? )

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No clue. I'm just moving the method to appropriate namespaces or libraries.

@Jim8y
Copy link
Contributor

Jim8y commented Nov 5, 2024

@cschuchardt88 please fix conflics, is this one the current blocker?

@cschuchardt88
Copy link
Member Author

Awaiting on part-6 before I fix it

@Jim8y Jim8y added Blocker Issues that are blocking other issues. Check issues details to see what it is blocking. and removed Blocked This issue can't be worked at the moment labels Nov 25, 2024
@Jim8y
Copy link
Contributor

Jim8y commented Nov 25, 2024

@cschuchardt88 please fix the conflicts.

@cschuchardt88
Copy link
Member Author

@Jim8y done, fixed all merging errors

if (parameter.Value is BigInteger bi)
builder.EmitPush(bi);
else
builder.EmitPush((BigInteger)typeof(BigInteger).GetConstructor([parameter.Value.GetType()]).Invoke([parameter.Value]));
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we change this ugly old code?

Copy link
Member Author

@cschuchardt88 cschuchardt88 Nov 26, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I rather leave for another pr.

Copy link
Member

@shargon shargon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If not, it's ok to me

@Jim8y Jim8y added Ready to Merge and removed Blocker Issues that are blocking other issues. Check issues details to see what it is blocking. Waiting for Review labels Nov 28, 2024
@NGDAdmin NGDAdmin merged commit 43ae8db into neo-project:master Nov 29, 2024
6 of 7 checks passed
@cschuchardt88 cschuchardt88 deleted the rebuild/the-split-7 branch November 29, 2024 07:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants