-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Relocate transaction verification #1507
Relocate transaction verification #1507
Conversation
Merge from master
Merge from master
Merge from neo master
Limit the max height for some SYSCALLs (neo-project#1494)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good, as soon as possible we filter better.
I think that this will produce the same behaviour than parallel verification, but hard to test it because we will need more nodes. |
…m/Qiao-Jin/neo into relocate_transaction_verification
Have seperate sender fee check from transaction verication and thus avoid unsafe situation, plz have a check:) |
The same transactions from different nodes will be verified multiple times? |
I think it's acceptable. If one arrives first, it will enter the mempool, and the next same tx will be filtered. |
@Qiao-Jin Can you review my changes? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this is OK.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good
CLose #1479