Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for UpSampling layers to converter #130

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Mar 5, 2020
Merged

Add support for UpSampling layers to converter #130

merged 6 commits into from
Mar 5, 2020

Conversation

drasmuss
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@drasmuss drasmuss force-pushed the upsample branch 2 times, most recently from f6f84bb to 13f9024 Compare January 30, 2020 15:43
bias_relay,
output,
transform=nengo.Sparse(
(output.size_in, bias_relay.size_out), indices=broadcast_indices
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would explicitly set init=1 here, just to make it clear what the sparse values are.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I assumed that it was 1, personally. If we thought it would be ambiguous we should have made init a required argument in nengo.Sparse, but since that didn't come up when working on that, I feel like it's what we would naturally assume.

@hunse hunse mentioned this pull request Mar 5, 2020
1 task
@tbekolay tbekolay changed the base branch from memory-opt to master March 5, 2020 16:58
Copy link
Member

@tbekolay tbekolay left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This all LGTM. I'll merge when CI finishes unless @drasmuss wants to make the init=1 change.

@tbekolay tbekolay merged commit a066120 into master Mar 5, 2020
@tbekolay tbekolay deleted the upsample branch March 5, 2020 19:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants