Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor log4j-jpa to use junit5 #6

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: 2.x
Choose a base branch
from
Open

refactor log4j-jpa to use junit5 #6

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

hulkoba
Copy link

@hulkoba hulkoba commented Oct 2, 2024

[A clear and concise description of what the pull request is for along with a reference to the associated issue IDs, if they exist.]

Checklist

  • Base your changes on 2.x branch if you are targeting Log4j 2; use main otherwise
  • ./mvnw verify succeeds (if it fails due to code formatting issues reported by Spotless, simply run ./mvnw spotless:apply and retry)
  • Non-trivial changes contain an entry file in the src/changelog/.2.x.x directory
  • Tests for the changes are provided
  • Commits are signed (optional, but highly recommended)

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 2, 2024

Job Requested goals Build Tool Version Build Outcome Build Scan®
build-macos-latest clean install 3.9.8 Build Scan NOT_PUBLISHED
build-ubuntu-latest clean install 3.9.8 Build Scan NOT_PUBLISHED
build-windows-latest clean install 3.9.8 Build Scan NOT_PUBLISHED
Generated by gradle/develocity-actions

public class ContextStackJsonAttributeConverterTest {
private ContextStackJsonAttributeConverter converter;

@Rule
public final ThreadContextStackRule threadContextRule = new ThreadContextStackRule();

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

First time I see this ThreadContextStackRule into @UsingThreadContextStack 🫶 If you could document this in the wiki, that would be great, thanks!

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It is documented in the code, as a comment in the related file. Otherwise I would have done this :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants