-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 434
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
coverage html crashes with RecursionError in ast traversal #1774
Comments
Actually I'm not sure about this. I just reproduced this in a different way with 7.4.4... |
Wow, interesting bug report. When I try it, it does happen with 7.4.4 as well as 7.5.0. In fact, it happens without coverage at all: import ast
import inspect
import sympy.polys.numberfields.resolvent_lookup as mod
source = inspect.getsource(mod)
# Causes RecursionError: maximum recursion depth exceeded
ast.NodeVisitor().visit(ast.parse(source)) Has something else changed along with the 7.4.4->7.5.0 coverage update? The file is relatively new (18 months) but I would expect it to have failed like this before now. |
Thanks Ned.
I think it must be a while since I last tried to make a coverage html report that would have included this file. I was getting confused before about which versions of coverage I was testing with because of mixed up virtual environments. I guess what is new is just this file in sympy... |
Strangely though the code that you showed crashes if I run it as a direct script but not if run in ipython: In [1]: import ast
...: import inspect
...: import sympy.polys.numberfields.resolvent_lookup as mod
...: source = inspect.getsource(mod)
...: # no error here
...: ast.NodeVisitor().visit(ast.parse(source))
In [2]: I'm not sure why that would be... In any case I suppose that this is an |
I don't think it's an ast bug. If you use |
A recursion limit of 1100 fails, 1200 succeeds. The usual limit is 1000. |
It looks like the if sys.version_info >= (3, 10):
from ast import MatchClass
else:
class MatchClass: pass
if sys.version_info >= (3, 12):
from ast import TypeAlias
else:
class TypeAlias: pass
def get_soft_key_lines(source):
"""Helper for finding lines with soft keywords, like match/case lines."""
tree = ast.parse(source)
soft_key_lines = set()
for node in ast.walk(tree):
if isinstance(node, MatchClass):
soft_key_lines.add(node.lineno)
elif isinstance(node, TypeAlias):
soft_key_lines.add(node.lineno)
for case in node.cases:
soft_key_lines.add(case.pattern.lineno)
return soft_key_lines Unfortunately after making that change I get basically the same error coming from |
Yes, coverage uses the ast in three places (up from two in 7.4.4). I'm wondering about limiting the depth of exploration, since it would also save time, and maybe caching the parses. |
Fixed in commit 5fa9f67. |
This is now released as part of coverage 7.5.1. |
Thanks Ned! I was still thinking what could fix this. It seems to me that the ast module is missing some kind of generic primitive that would be usable for something like RegionFinder. There is It is problematic that NodeVisitor breaks with large expressions but there is not much else provided for traversal. |
[![Mend Renovate](https://app.renovatebot.com/images/banner.svg)](https://renovatebot.com) This PR contains the following updates: | Package | Change | Age | Adoption | Passing | Confidence | |---|---|---|---|---|---| | [coverage](https://togithub.com/nedbat/coveragepy) | `==7.5.0` -> `==7.5.1` | [![age](https://developer.mend.io/api/mc/badges/age/pypi/coverage/7.5.1?slim=true)](https://docs.renovatebot.com/merge-confidence/) | [![adoption](https://developer.mend.io/api/mc/badges/adoption/pypi/coverage/7.5.1?slim=true)](https://docs.renovatebot.com/merge-confidence/) | [![passing](https://developer.mend.io/api/mc/badges/compatibility/pypi/coverage/7.5.0/7.5.1?slim=true)](https://docs.renovatebot.com/merge-confidence/) | [![confidence](https://developer.mend.io/api/mc/badges/confidence/pypi/coverage/7.5.0/7.5.1?slim=true)](https://docs.renovatebot.com/merge-confidence/) | --- ### Release Notes <details> <summary>nedbat/coveragepy (coverage)</summary> ### [`v7.5.1`](https://togithub.com/nedbat/coveragepy/blob/HEAD/CHANGES.rst#Version-751--2024-05-04) [Compare Source](https://togithub.com/nedbat/coveragepy/compare/7.5.0...7.5.1) - Fix: a pragma comment on the continuation lines of a multi-line statement now excludes the statement and its body, the same as if the pragma is on the first line. This closes `issue 754`*. The fix was contributed by `Daniel Diniz <pull 1773_>`*. - Fix: very complex source files like `this one <resolvent_lookup_>`\_ could cause a maximum recursion error when creating an HTML report. This is now fixed, closing `issue 1774`\_. - HTML report improvements: - Support files (JavaScript and CSS) referenced by the HTML report now have hashes added to their names to ensure updated files are used instead of stale cached copies. - Missing branch coverage explanations that said "the condition was never false" now read "the condition was always true" because it's easier to understand. - Column sort order is remembered better as you move between the index pages, fixing `issue 1766`*. Thanks, `Daniel Diniz <pull 1768_>`*. .. \_resolvent_lookup: https://github.com/sympy/sympy/blob/130950f3e6b3f97fcc17f4599ac08f70fdd2e9d4/sympy/polys/numberfields/resolvent_lookup.py .. \_issue 754[https://github.com/nedbat/coveragepy/issues/754](https://togithub.com/nedbat/coveragepy/issues/754)54 .. \_issue 176[https://github.com/nedbat/coveragepy/issues/1766](https://togithub.com/nedbat/coveragepy/issues/1766)766 .. \_pull 17[https://github.com/nedbat/coveragepy/pull/1768](https://togithub.com/nedbat/coveragepy/pull/1768)1768 .. \_pull 1[https://github.com/nedbat/coveragepy/pull/1773](https://togithub.com/nedbat/coveragepy/pull/1773)/1773 .. \_issue [https://github.com/nedbat/coveragepy/issues/1774](https://togithub.com/nedbat/coveragepy/issues/1774)s/1774 .. \_changes\_7-5-0: </details> --- ### Configuration 📅 **Schedule**: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined). 🚦 **Automerge**: Enabled. ♻ **Rebasing**: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox. 🔕 **Ignore**: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again. --- - [ ] <!-- rebase-check -->If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box --- This PR has been generated by [Mend Renovate](https://www.mend.io/free-developer-tools/renovate/). View repository job log [here](https://developer.mend.io/github/allenporter/flux-local). <!--renovate-debug:eyJjcmVhdGVkSW5WZXIiOiIzNy4zMzEuMCIsInVwZGF0ZWRJblZlciI6IjM3LjMzMS4wIiwidGFyZ2V0QnJhbmNoIjoibWFpbiIsImxhYmVscyI6W119--> Co-authored-by: renovate[bot] <29139614+renovate[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Describe the bug
Running
coverage html
crashes with RecursionError in ast traversal when trying to measure coverage of SymPy'ssympy.polys
module.To Reproduce
Tested in a fresh venv with Python 3.8, 3.11 and 3.12 using coverage 7.5.0. It seems to be a new problem in coverage 7.5.0 because I can't reproduce it with e.g. coverage 7.4.4.
To reproduce run:
Then
coverage html
crashes out with:Expected behavior
Should produce coverage html report.
Additional context
There are other ways to reproduce this e.g. in a sympy git checkout:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: