fix(db): Consider hot and cold dbs archivals

[posvyatokum]

This reflect my understanding of DBKinds. Archive, Hot, and Cold dbs are only present in archival nodes. RPC is the only non-archival db kind.
This change will make it harder for people to open Hot storage as a single DB in non-archival mode. They will first have to change DBKind of hot db to RPC using the database tool of neard. Then, if they want to open this db as part of split storage again, they will need to change DBKind back using the same tool.

This whole part of code is due to a refactoring. I will think about the best project for this tasks on Monday.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 1 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 71.57%. Comparing base (f42345a) to head (ffef08c).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Files	Patch %	Lines
core/store/src/lib.rs	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #10960      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   67.13%   71.57%   +4.44%     
==========================================
  Files         746      758      +12     
  Lines      150860   152127    +1267     
  Branches   150860   152127    +1267     
==========================================
+ Hits       101274   108890    +7616     
+ Misses      45288    38737    -6551     
- Partials     4298     4500     +202     

Flag	Coverage Δ
backward-compatibility	0.24% <0.00%> (?)
db-migration	0.24% <0.00%> (?)
genesis-check	1.42% <0.00%> (?)
integration-tests	37.17% <0.00%> (?)
linux	70.03% <0.00%> (+3.53%)	⬆️
linux-nightly	71.07% <0.00%> (+4.46%)	⬆️
macos	54.55% <0.00%> (?)
pytests	1.65% <0.00%> (?)
sanity-checks	1.44% <0.00%> (?)
unittests	67.19% <0.00%> (+0.06%)	⬆️
upgradability	0.29% <0.00%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.