You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It would be nice (and consistent with nats-py and the nats-server to set the SNI extension when connecting via TLS. That allows for load balancing to work properly in the cloud.
Use case
We hae nats instances for each of our customers. We are on the cloud. Today we have to use 1 load balancer per client. With the Fix to issue 780 and the addition of handshake_first, the last issue is that the Client Hello is missing the SNI extension. That can be done with 1 simple call to OpenSSL
Contribution
definitely.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Proposed change
It would be nice (and consistent with nats-py and the nats-server to set the SNI extension when connecting via TLS. That allows for load balancing to work properly in the cloud.
Use case
We hae nats instances for each of our customers. We are on the cloud. Today we have to use 1 load balancer per client. With the Fix to issue 780 and the addition of handshake_first, the last issue is that the Client Hello is missing the SNI extension. That can be done with 1 simple call to OpenSSL
Contribution
definitely.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: