Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Applications should use all-inclusive "cfe.h" header #77

Closed
jphickey opened this issue Mar 9, 2021 · 0 comments · Fixed by #78
Closed

Applications should use all-inclusive "cfe.h" header #77

jphickey opened this issue Mar 9, 2021 · 0 comments · Fixed by #78
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Milestone

Comments

@jphickey
Copy link
Contributor

jphickey commented Mar 9, 2021

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
The CFE documentation recommends that applications use the supplied cfe.h header which in turn provides all CFE core, PSP, and OSAL APIs as well as mission config.

Because some header names are getting changed in nasa/cFE#1203, including the headers individually becomes a problem.

Describe the solution you'd like
Change to using the cfe.h all-inclusive header, which makes ci_lab work with the new directory structure, and should avoid future issues, and it matches what the documentation recommends.

Describe alternatives you've considered
Change cfe_msg_api.h -> cfe_msg.h

Additional context
Needed for nasa/cFE#1203

Requester Info
Joseph Hickey, Vantage Systems, Inc.

jphickey added a commit to jphickey/ci_lab that referenced this issue Mar 9, 2021
The all-inclusive header should give everything needed, and be
more future proof in case component names ever need to change.
@skliper skliper added this to the 2.5.0 milestone Mar 9, 2021
@skliper skliper added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 9, 2021
astrogeco added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 11, 2021
Fix #77, use cfe.h instead of individual headers
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants