Fix #382, Reuse CodeQL, Static Analysis, Format Check

[ArielSAdamsNASA]

Checklist (Please check before submitting)

• I reviewed the Contributing Guide.
• I signed and emailed the appropriate Contributor License agreement to [email protected] and copied [email protected].

Describe the contribution
Fixes #382

Testing performed
Tested on forked repos.
OSAL Static Analysis Reuse: https://github.com/ArielSAdamsNASA/osal/actions/runs/1387270204 - runs bundle and strict osal
cFS Static Analysis Reuse: https://github.com/ArielSAdamsNASA/cFS-JSF-Rules/actions/runs/1390418206
OSAL CodeQL Reuse cFE Build: https://github.com/ArielSAdamsNASA/osal/runs/4023159610?check_suite_focus=true
OSAL CodeQL Reuse OSAL Default: https://github.com/ArielSAdamsNASA/osal/actions/runs/1390702434
cFS CodeQL Reuse: https://github.com/ArielSAdamsNASA/cFS-JSF-Rules/actions/runs/1390777421
OSAL Format Check Reuse: https://github.com/ArielSAdamsNASA/osal/actions/runs/1390702433
cFS Format Check: https://github.com/ArielSAdamsNASA/cFS-JSF-Rules/actions/runs/1390865379

Expected behavior changes
cFS will hold the workflows for CodeQL, Static Analysis, and Format Check. These workflows will be called by all subrepos to use. cFS has to call on CodeQL and Static Analysis for the workflows to work. Format check does not need to be reused in cFS since there are no inputs.

To explain the new workflows, a diagram has been added to the README.md file. The PR does not show the image in the README.md file, but the same code and image works in the forked repo: https://github.com/ArielSAdamsNASA/cFS-JSF-Rules/blob/fix-382-reuse-workflows/.github/workflows/README.md

Additional context
The workflows calling the original actions will not work until it is integrated in main because of this code.
uses: nasa/cFS/.github/workflows/static-analysis.yml@main

Documentation: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/learn-github-actions/reusing-workflows

Contributor Info - All information REQUIRED for consideration of pull request
Ariel Adams, ASRC Federal

[ArielSAdamsNASA]

Change Static Analysis workflow to remove inputs.module. Add matrix back. Use cppcheck code for strict modules, but change the directory using an input.

Tested:
cFS Reuse Static Analysis: https://github.com/ArielSAdamsNASA/cFS-JSF-Rules/actions/runs/1391690020
OSAL Reuse Static Analysis: https://github.com/ArielSAdamsNASA/osal/actions/runs/1391621678

[skliper]

For now we probably want to add in the full directory list for the submodules to do the strict static analysis on so it replicates the old functionality. Can be just one big list now. Eventually the idea would be to abstract the list out at the cFS level and get it from each repo, but for now hard coding is fine.

[astrogeco]

CCB:2021-11-03 APPROVED

• Look at restructuring directories and maybe creating an "actions" directory that contains all the "building blocks"
• Merge this one first and then rename the submodule calls to reference the nasa/cfs repository instead of the fork