-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 204
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix #315, ES Performance debug messages #461
Conversation
CCB 20200115 - Needs further review for casting/format cleanup |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Scrub casting/formats for consistancy.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For the filter mask values, would it be worth using a fixed length format such as 0x%08X ?
For a 32 bit mask, the leading zeros might make the bit positions more obvious.
Example:
uint32_t test_val1 = 0x111;
printf("test_val 1 = 0x%08X\n",test_val1);
printf("test_val 1 = 0x%x\n",test_val1);
test_val 1 = 0x00000111
test_val 1 = 0x111
CCB 20200212 - Approved |
Describe the contribution
Fixes issue #315, ES Performance debug messages have incorrect parameter
Testing performed
Expected behavior changes
DEBUG messages are now correct.
System(s) tested on:
Oracle VM VirtualBox
OS: ubuntu-19.10
Version: cFE 6.7.3.0; OSAL 5.0.3.0; PSP 1.4.1.0
Contributor Info
Dan Knutsen
GSFC/NASA