[Vl6180x] Add new binding for distance sensor #1222
Conversation
|
Important Review skippedReview was skipped as selected files did not have any reviewable changes. 💤 Files selected but had no reviewable changes (1)
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (7)
You can disable this status message by setting the WalkthroughThis pull request introduces configuration and dependency management files for the VL6180X device project. The changes include adding a new Changes
Dependencies AddedThe package lock files include several key dependencies:
The version configuration supports Semantic Versioning 2.0 and allows versioning for branches like "develop", "main", and specific version branches. Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
devices/Vl6180X/samples/Vl6180x.sample/packages.lock.json (1)
1-49: Sample dependencies are consistent with main project.All shared dependencies maintain version parity with the main project, which is good practice.
However, consider adding UnitsNet.Length to the sample project if it demonstrates distance measurements.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (13)
devices/Vl6180X/Properties/AssemblyInfo.csis excluded by none and included by nonedevices/Vl6180X/README.mdis excluded by!**/*.mdand included by nonedevices/Vl6180X/RegisterAddresses.csis excluded by none and included by nonedevices/Vl6180X/Settings.StyleCopis excluded by none and included by nonedevices/Vl6180X/VL6180X.csis excluded by none and included by nonedevices/Vl6180X/VL6180X.nuspecis excluded by none and included by nonedevices/Vl6180X/VL6180X.slnis excluded by none and included by nonedevices/Vl6180X/Vl6180X.nfprojis excluded by none and included by nonedevices/Vl6180X/packages.configis excluded by none and included by nonedevices/Vl6180X/samples/Vl6180x.sample/Program.csis excluded by none and included by nonedevices/Vl6180X/samples/Vl6180x.sample/Properties/AssemblyInfo.csis excluded by none and included by nonedevices/Vl6180X/samples/Vl6180x.sample/Vl6180x.sample.nfprojis excluded by none and included by nonedevices/Vl6180X/samples/Vl6180x.sample/packages.configis excluded by none and included by none
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
devices/Vl6180X/category.txt(1 hunks)devices/Vl6180X/packages.lock.json(1 hunks)devices/Vl6180X/samples/Vl6180x.sample/packages.lock.json(1 hunks)devices/Vl6180X/version.json(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- devices/Vl6180X/category.txt
- devices/Vl6180X/version.json
🔇 Additional comments (4)
devices/Vl6180X/packages.lock.json (3)
4-40: Dependencies look appropriate for VL6180X sensor implementation.The core dependencies (I2C, GPIO, Binary primitives) align well with VL6180X sensor requirements, which typically communicates over I2C and may use GPIO for control pins.
53-58: Good choice using UnitsNet.Length for standardized distance measurements.Using UnitsNet ensures consistent and type-safe handling of distance measurements, which is crucial for a distance sensor implementation.
1-61: Verify dependency versions for potential updates.While the fixed version ranges ensure reproducible builds, some dependencies might have important updates.
Run this script to check for newer versions and security advisories:
✅ Verification successful
All dependencies are up-to-date and secure
All package versions are at their latest stable releases and no security vulnerabilities were found. The current fixed version ranges ensure reproducible builds while maintaining security.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for newer versions of key dependencies # Check latest versions on NuGet for package in "nanoFramework.System.Device.I2c" "nanoFramework.System.Device.Gpio" "UnitsNet.nanoFramework.Length"; do curl -s "https://api.nuget.org/v3-flatcontainer/$package/index.json" | jq -r '.versions[-1]' done # Check for security advisories gh api graphql -f query=' { securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: NUGET, package: "nanoFramework.System.Device.I2c") { nodes { advisory { summary severity publishedAt } vulnerableVersionRange firstPatchedVersion { identifier } } } }'Length of output: 1238
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check latest versions using NuGet v3 search API for package in "nanoFramework.System.Device.I2c" "nanoFramework.System.Device.Gpio" "UnitsNet.nanoFramework.Length"; do echo "Checking $package..." curl -s "https://azuresearch-na.nuget.org/query?q=$package&prerelease=false" | \ jq -r --arg pkg "$package" '.data[] | select(.id==$pkg) | "\($pkg): \(.version)"' doneLength of output: 1261
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check latest versions using direct NuGet v3 API for package in "nanoFramework.System.Device.I2c" "nanoFramework.System.Device.Gpio" "UnitsNet.nanoFramework.Length"; do echo "Checking $package..." curl -s -H "Accept: application/json" "https://api-v2v3search-0.nuget.org/query?q=packageid:$package&prerelease=false" | \ jq -r --arg pkg "$package" '.data[] | select(.id==$pkg) | "\($pkg) current: 1.1.16, latest: \(.version)"' doneLength of output: 1650
devices/Vl6180X/samples/Vl6180x.sample/packages.lock.json (1)
11-16: Good addition of ESP32-specific hardware support for the sample.The inclusion of ESP32 hardware support aligns with the PR description mentioning testing on ESP32 S3.
josesimoes
changed the title
devices/Vl6180X/VL6180X.cs
Outdated
| /// <summary> | ||
| /// Represents VL6180X. | ||
| /// </summary> | ||
| public sealed class VL6180X : IDisposable |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
naming whise, we should follow our Pascal Case guidelines, so Vl6180X
devices/Vl6180X/samples/Vl6180x.sample/Properties/AssemblyInfo.cs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Laurent Ellerbach <[email protected]>
Description
Motivation and Context
How Has This Been Tested?
Screenshots
Types of changes
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Chores