-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(core): Ensure job processor does not reprocess amended executions #11438
Merged
ivov
merged 2 commits into
master
from
pay-2100-cannot-read-properties-of-undefined-reading-node
Oct 29, 2024
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
21 changes: 21 additions & 0 deletions
21
packages/cli/src/scaling/__tests__/job-processor.service.test.ts
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ | ||
import { mock } from 'jest-mock-extended'; | ||
|
||
import type { ExecutionRepository } from '@/databases/repositories/execution.repository'; | ||
import type { IExecutionResponse } from '@/interfaces'; | ||
|
||
import { JobProcessor } from '../job-processor'; | ||
import type { Job } from '../scaling.types'; | ||
|
||
describe('JobProcessor', () => { | ||
it('should refrain from processing a crashed execution', async () => { | ||
const executionRepository = mock<ExecutionRepository>(); | ||
executionRepository.findSingleExecution.mockResolvedValue( | ||
mock<IExecutionResponse>({ status: 'crashed' }), | ||
); | ||
const jobProcessor = new JobProcessor(mock(), executionRepository, mock(), mock(), mock()); | ||
|
||
const result = await jobProcessor.processJob(mock<Job>()); | ||
|
||
expect(result).toEqual({ success: false }); | ||
}); | ||
}); |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Are we using the return value for anything?
I only found this function being called here, and there we're not using the result:
n8n/packages/cli/src/scaling/scaling.service.ts
Line 94 in ad29235
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Historically we never used the result, we've only relied on promise resolution or rejection. The important bit is the early return to resolve the promise without any reprocessing of the crashed execution. I went for
{ success: false }
to keep the return type simple, aligned with what is already there.