Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[test] Testing react 16.9 release candidate #16852

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

eps1lon
Copy link
Member

@eps1lon eps1lon commented Aug 1, 2019

Testing release candidate (new runtime warnings, act warnings, useEffect + setState)

react changelog draft

Bundle size changes are likely due to react-is and scheduler changes. We should mark every dependency of react and react-dom as external when calculating bundle size. This includes scheduler. Not sure about react-is. Likely react-is. Scheduler isn't is as per #16904

@eps1lon eps1lon added the test label Aug 1, 2019
@mui-pr-bot
Copy link

mui-pr-bot commented Aug 1, 2019

Details of bundle changes.

Comparing: ba2b44c...f21b726

bundle parsed diff gzip diff prev parsed current parsed prev gzip current gzip
@material-ui/core +0.05% 🔺 +0.09% 🔺 329,663 329,833 90,121 90,198
@material-ui/core/Paper +0.25% 🔺 +0.25% 🔺 68,684 68,854 20,469 20,520
@material-ui/core/Paper.esm +0.27% 🔺 +0.24% 🔺 62,058 62,228 19,209 19,255
@material-ui/core/Popper 0.00% 0.00% 29,185 29,185 10,434 10,434
@material-ui/core/Textarea 0.00% 0.00% 5,759 5,759 2,368 2,368
@material-ui/core/TrapFocus 0.00% 0.00% 3,834 3,834 1,617 1,617
@material-ui/core/styles/createMuiTheme 0.00% 0.00% 16,389 16,389 5,824 5,824
@material-ui/core/useMediaQuery 0.00% 0.00% 3,213 3,213 1,311 1,311
@material-ui/lab +0.11% 🔺 +0.10% 🔺 152,607 152,777 46,520 46,568
@material-ui/styles +0.33% 🔺 +0.35% 🔺 51,401 51,571 15,285 15,338
@material-ui/system 0.00% 0.00% 15,666 15,666 4,350 4,350
Button +0.21% 🔺 +0.20% 🔺 79,421 79,591 24,279 24,327
Modal 0.00% 0.00% 15,050 15,050 5,233 5,233
Portal 0.00% 0.00% 3,579 3,579 1,568 1,568
Rating +0.24% 🔺 +0.24% 🔺 70,735 70,905 22,079 22,132
Slider +0.23% 🔺 +0.21% 🔺 75,066 75,236 23,271 23,320
colorManipulator 0.00% 0.00% 3,904 3,904 1,543 1,543
docs.landing 0.00% 0.00% 52,124 52,124 13,837 13,837
docs.main +1.29% 🔺 +1.25% 🔺 590,550 598,182 188,602 190,967
packages/material-ui/build/umd/material-ui.production.min.js +0.06% 🔺 +0.05% 🔺 299,964 300,129 86,137 86,184

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against f21b726

@eps1lon eps1lon changed the title [test] Testing react 16.9 canary [test] Testing react 16.9 release candidate Aug 6, 2019
@oliviertassinari
Copy link
Member

@eps1lon It's continuous integration is green :). Should we expect more than it from the pull request?

@eps1lon
Copy link
Member Author

eps1lon commented Aug 8, 2019

Should we expect more than it from the pull request?

Testing release candidate (new runtime warnings, act warnings, useEffect + setState)

Could you actively engage in communicating what you want from this PR?

@oliviertassinari
Copy link
Member

oliviertassinari commented Aug 8, 2019

From what I understand, the value of the pull request is to test the release candidate of React v16.9.0, to detect potential issues ahead of time, before our users do. Now that it's green, we are good. I believe that we can close it. Then, Dependabot will take care of updating the dependency for us. Have I missed a step in the reasoning?

@eps1lon
Copy link
Member Author

eps1lon commented Aug 8, 2019

Have I missed a step in the reasoning?

Yes: React isn't release yet. There might be another rc. It's the same reason I didn't close it after the canary was green.

Edit: And then there's the issue of development happening on master which we might want to check against 16.9.

@oliviertassinari
Copy link
Member

Ok, awesome!

@eps1lon eps1lon closed this Aug 9, 2019
@eps1lon eps1lon deleted the chore/try-react-canary branch August 9, 2019 06:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants