Add WICG File Handling (defer) #274
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Also one other point of feedback that I think is better discussed in the issue: #158 (comment)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM given existing org value constraints. I too had marked something "WICG" and it was corrected to "W3C". Yes we need to distinguish Individual (proposal) vs CG/BG (incubation) vs WG (standards track) documents, however that should not block us from committing this standards position. Once we make those distinctions (including mapping proposal vs incubation vs standardstrack to IETF RFC levels, 262 Levels and other orgs), we'll likely need to re-evaluate existing standards positions anyway to make those distinctions.
annevk
force-pushed
the
annevk/file-handling
branch
from
aff9139
to
e39ea53
Compare
|
@dbaron I rebased this and changed the org to Proposal. Okay to merge this or do you think we should investigate more? |
Closes #158.