Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Different containers should have seperated browsing history #1544

Closed
garywill opened this issue Oct 20, 2019 · 6 comments
Closed

Different containers should have seperated browsing history #1544

garywill opened this issue Oct 20, 2019 · 6 comments

Comments

@garywill
Copy link

  • Multi-Account Containers Version: 6.1.1
  • Operating System + Version: linux
  • Firefox Version: 68
  • Other installed Add-ons + Version + Enabled/Disabled-Status:

Actual behavior

On homepage's "Top Sites" section and toolbar's "history", shows our browsing history. You browse a URL in one container and it's showed in all containers.

Expected behavior

In one container won't see others' history.

Notes

"History" section shows other container's URL will mislead users to click, then the URL is opened in a container that we don't mean to use.

@silvererudite
Copy link

Would be a nice feature for truly isolating everything. @maxxcrawford and @groovecoder would like to work on it.
Any idea how to approach it?

@alittlebitofit
Copy link

alittlebitofit commented Oct 28, 2019

Yes, I second this too. Is this being implemented?

It would also be good if like default containers you could choose whether or not you want the history to be saved.

For example: Never Remember History of a Work Container, or remember only Personal Container's history.

@silvererudite
Copy link

Oooh @alittlebitofit. Yes I'm trying to implement this trying things here and there. Looks like I need more research and trials. love your idea as well.

@alittlebitofit
Copy link

Oh wow thanks for the encouragement! I'm looking forward to it :D

@kendallcorner
Copy link
Collaborator

This is a duplicate of #1233. Please vote or discuss on that issue. Also see this comment: #1386 (comment)

@kendallcorner
Copy link
Collaborator

Original is actually #537

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants