Display block type in reviewer tools & Use specific activity log for soft-blocking versions #22891
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…soft-blocking versions
diox
requested review from
a team and
KevinMind
and removed request for
a team
KevinMind
reviewed
Nov 25, 2024
|
Soft -> Hard -> Soft 
Hard -> Soft -> Hard -> Unblocked 
|
KevinMind
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 27, 2024
…soft-blocking versions (#22891) * Display block type in reviewer tools & Use specific activity log for soft-blocking versions
chrstinalin
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 10, 2025
…soft-blocking versions (#22891) * Display block type in reviewer tools & Use specific activity log for soft-blocking versions
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes: mozilla/addons#15125
Testing
Add some hard and soft-blocks / harden some soft-blocks / soften some hard-blocks: this should be reflected in reviewer tools review page next to the corresponding version in the history. (For accurate soft-block info, the block need to have been created as soft or softened after applying this patch)
Screenshots
Version soft-blocked:
Version soft-blocked then hardened:
