Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 13, 2023. It is now read-only.

Avoid triggering validation errors in dynamodb #893

Closed
bbangert opened this issue May 12, 2017 · 0 comments
Closed

Avoid triggering validation errors in dynamodb #893

bbangert opened this issue May 12, 2017 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@bbangert
Copy link
Member

Fields that can't be empty are being left empty. See:

@bbangert bbangert self-assigned this May 12, 2017
bbangert added a commit that referenced this issue May 26, 2017
The existing bridge API was overly permissive on parameters and
difficult to follow on necessary values. As a result this became
a bit larger than originally anticiated and is a refactor of the
bridge API into distinct handlers for each distinct URL path with
re-usable and specific validation schema's.

Closes #893
bbangert added a commit that referenced this issue May 26, 2017
The existing bridge API was overly permissive on parameters and
difficult to follow on necessary values. As a result this became
a bit larger than originally anticiated and is a refactor of the
bridge API into distinct handlers for each distinct URL path with
re-usable and specific validation schema's.

Closes #893
bbangert added a commit that referenced this issue May 26, 2017
The existing bridge API was overly permissive on parameters and
difficult to follow on necessary values. As a result this became
a bit larger than originally anticiated and is a refactor of the
bridge API into distinct handlers for each distinct URL path with
re-usable and specific validation schema's.

Closes #893
bbangert added a commit that referenced this issue May 27, 2017
The existing bridge API was overly permissive on parameters and
difficult to follow on necessary values. As a result this became
a bit larger than originally anticiated and is a refactor of the
bridge API into distinct handlers for each distinct URL path with
re-usable and specific validation schema's.

Closes #893
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants