Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bug: Add proper update_user logic for Bigtable #503

Merged
merged 34 commits into from
Jan 11, 2024
Merged

Conversation

jrconlin
Copy link
Member

@jrconlin jrconlin commented Nov 3, 2023

Closes: SYNC-3982

@jrconlin jrconlin requested a review from pjenvey November 3, 2023 01:08
@jrconlin jrconlin changed the title Bug/sync 3982 bt reg bug: Add proper update_user logic for Bigtable Nov 3, 2023
@jrconlin jrconlin marked this pull request as ready for review November 15, 2023 21:53
@jrconlin jrconlin marked this pull request as draft December 20, 2023 01:41
One for the family and webpush, another for the range check. As I
Understand, you shouldn't have multiple column name filters and value
filters mixed together on the same chain as it could cause mis-matches,
but I have no idea how to join chains.
@jrconlin jrconlin marked this pull request as ready for review December 21, 2023 22:21
Copy link
Member

@pjenvey pjenvey left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

With the changes on this branch we can continue using be bytes for connected_at like the other numeric types

@jrconlin jrconlin requested a review from pjenvey January 11, 2024 01:05
@jrconlin jrconlin merged commit 89c3bd9 into master Jan 11, 2024
1 check passed
@jrconlin jrconlin deleted the bug/SYNC-3982-bt_reg branch January 11, 2024 20:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants