For #10642: Comment out verifyPageContent calls

[AaronMT]

Issue #10642 (verifyPageContent) is very flaky and causing test timeouts in test-failures. I wouldn't be surprised if the MockWebServer version we're using from 2018 is part of the problem, for now comment out each verifyPageContent call and the function. Retaining its definition so we can still investigate on the side.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #11748 into master will decrease coverage by 0.05%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master   #11748      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     21.81%   21.76%   -0.06%     
  Complexity      716      716              
============================================
  Files           375      375              
  Lines         15048    15071      +23     
  Branches       1952     1957       +5     
============================================
- Hits           3283     3280       -3     
- Misses        11482    11508      +26     
  Partials        283      283              

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ	Complexity Δ
.../fenix/browser/browsingmode/BrowsingModeManager.kt	85.71% <0.00%> (-14.29%)	0.00% <0.00%> (ø%)
...nix/components/toolbar/BrowserToolbarController.kt	68.20% <0.00%> (-2.32%)	0.00% <0.00%> (ø%)
...pp/src/main/java/org/mozilla/fenix/HomeActivity.kt	8.67% <0.00%> (+<0.01%)	10.00% <0.00%> (ø%)

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 82cbafa...c2e3da3. Read the comment docs.

[rpappalax]

Issue #10642 (verifyPageContent) is very flaky and causing test timeouts in test-failures. I wouldn't be surprised if the MockWebServer version we're using from 2018 is part of the problem, for now comment out each verifyPageContent call and the function. Retaining its definition so we can still investigate on the side.

@AaronMT thanks, Aaron. Is the follow-up work being tracked in a separate issue? I want to make sure this has a clear owner before we move on