Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Downgrade qos to client sub if needed #229

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 11, 2019
Merged

Downgrade qos to client sub if needed #229

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 11, 2019

Conversation

GavinDmello
Copy link
Collaborator

@GavinDmello GavinDmello commented Feb 2, 2019

Solution for #208

delete packet.messageId
t.deepEqual(packet, expected, 'packet must match')
t.end()
})
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you add some checks on the follow up packets to verify that the full QoS flow is respected?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@mcollina
Copy link
Collaborator

Yes we do! Can you use them in this test?

@GavinDmello
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@mcollina I've already used the publish and subscribe helper functions in the test 👍.

Copy link
Collaborator

@mcollina mcollina left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants