Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

External Validators Rewards pallet #736

Merged
merged 53 commits into from
Nov 14, 2024
Merged

Conversation

nanocryk
Copy link
Contributor

@nanocryk nanocryk commented Oct 30, 2024

Pallet storing reward points for external validators. HistoryDepth allows to specify how many eras points should be kept in storage.

@nanocryk nanocryk added a0-pleasereview Pull request needs code review. B7-runtimenoteworthy Changes should be noted in any runtime-upgrade release notes D5-nicetohaveaudit⚠️ PR contains trivial changes to logic that should be properly reviewed. not-breaking Does not need to be mentioned in breaking changes labels Nov 7, 2024
@nanocryk nanocryk marked this pull request as ready for review November 7, 2024 13:13
@girazoki
Copy link
Collaborator

girazoki commented Nov 7, 2024

Pr looks good besides:

  • let's add some integration tests in rust please
  • let's add some test in typescript (at least, making sure Alice gets reward points for creating blocks)

Copy link
Collaborator

@girazoki girazoki left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this looks correct to me, waiting for anyone else to comment!

@nanocryk nanocryk merged commit a9fd0af into master Nov 14, 2024
42 checks passed
@nanocryk nanocryk deleted the jeremy-external-validators-rewards branch November 14, 2024 09:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
a0-pleasereview Pull request needs code review. B7-runtimenoteworthy Changes should be noted in any runtime-upgrade release notes D5-nicetohaveaudit⚠️ PR contains trivial changes to logic that should be properly reviewed. not-breaking Does not need to be mentioned in breaking changes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants