-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 140
Conversation
This centralized a large chunk of the hard coded strings. The idea is to make it easier to convert from raw to gir. For example, RAW uses "enum", but GIR uses "enumeration". Using the const string we can find all places in the generator that references "enum" as well as update the name in only one place.
Are you going to switch to gir for gtk 2.12? |
That's what I'm hoping for. The bigger idea/thought is once this is switched over to gir and flushed out that we could move to gtk 2.24 instead of gtk 2.12. |
@stsundermann yes, we are. And we're going to make incremental updates, like 2.12, 2.24 then move over to 3.x+ |
Actually, I had the same idea and started working on a gir generator some months ago. Rather than updating the gtk generator I started from scratch since .gir is quite different from the .raw files. The idea was to even generate bindings for GObject and GLib using the new generator and then adding the type system on top of those automated bindings. |
@stsundermann I looked over the GIR files, they're not that much different, it's mostly a matter of mapping the gtk raw file metadata to GIR values |
What's the motivation behind moving to 4.7.1? |
Do you consider splitting up the generator and type system from gtk-sharp (something like gi-sharp)? Currently, users have to install gtk-sharp even if a binding does not depend on gtk but only glib/gobject-sharp. |
@stsundermann There's a really rough doc atm on what we're planning, but feel free to add ideas into it and we can fix all the issues we currently have: https://paper.dropbox.com/doc/GTK-modernizing-plan-0XpX07nxjdQyKsHx7c09G This will be moved over to the wiki as soon as v1 of it is done. |
f2a723e
to
fe22d18
Compare
You can also take a look at https://github.com/shana/bindinator which converts .gir to .raw. It should provide information on the gir <-> raw xml tag mapping. |
Removed that, we don't need to change that for now. |
Thanks @Therzok. I guess you guys were thinking of allowing new C# language features. However, IMO it should remain easy to package/compile on at least LTS distributions (which maybe can compile 4.5.2, but not 4.7.1). |
@knocte there's also the fact that .NET Framework on windows is tied to specific Windows versions. We need to consider where to cut the line for dropping support for XP/Vista, etc |
.NET 4.0 is a good idea to bump to as XP is EOL already, but yeah. |
This centralized a large chunk of the hard coded strings. The idea is
to make it easier to convert from raw to gir. For example, RAW uses
"enum", but GIR uses "enumeration". Using the const string we can find
all places in the generator that references "enum" as well as update the
name in only one place.