-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor(NODE-6411): AbstractCursor accepts an external timeout context #4264
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
baileympearson
changed the title
feat(NODE-6090): Implement CSOT logic for connection checkout and ser…
refactor(NODE-6411): Make the abstract cursor accept an external timeout context
Oct 2, 2024
baileympearson
force-pushed
the
NODE-6411
branch
from
October 3, 2024 19:19
2b5a275
to
c6f4bcf
Compare
baileympearson
force-pushed
the
NODE-6411
branch
from
October 4, 2024 15:27
c6f4bcf
to
64ed80f
Compare
baileympearson
changed the title
refactor(NODE-6411): Make the abstract cursor accept an external timeout context
refactor(NODE-6411): AbstractCursor accepts an external timeout context
Oct 4, 2024
baileympearson
commented
Oct 4, 2024
); | ||
} | ||
this.cursorOptions.timeoutMode = options.timeoutMode; | ||
if (options.tailable && this.cursorOptions.timeoutMode === CursorTimeoutMode.LIFETIME) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just a bit of cleanup, happy to revert.
W-A-James
added
the
Primary Review
In Review with primary reviewer, not yet ready for team's eyes
label
Oct 4, 2024
W-A-James
approved these changes
Oct 4, 2024
W-A-James
added
Team Review
Needs review from team
and removed
Primary Review
In Review with primary reviewer, not yet ready for team's eyes
labels
Oct 4, 2024
durran
approved these changes
Oct 4, 2024
baileympearson
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 10, 2024
baileympearson
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 10, 2024
nbbeeken
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 14, 2024
baileympearson
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 21, 2024
nbbeeken
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 1, 2024
nbbeeken
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 5, 2024
dariakp
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 6, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
What is changing?
The abstract cursor now accepts an external timeout. This lets operations which create cursors share their timeout contexts with the abstract cursor. This required a handful of changes:
refreshed
methodI also removed some usages of
isCSOTEnabled()
by adding amaxTimeMS
property to the TimeoutContext. We can iterate on this and removeomitMaxTimeMS
too if we want by making cursors conditionally returnnull
when they should not set maxTimeMS, but I considered this out of scope for this PR.Is there new documentation needed for these changes?
What is the motivation for this change?
Release Highlight
Fill in title or leave empty for no highlight
Double check the following
npm run check:lint
scripttype(NODE-xxxx)[!]: description
feat(NODE-1234)!: rewriting everything in coffeescript