-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor(NODE-6230): executeOperation to use iterative retry mechanism #4157
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
nbbeeken
added
the
Primary Review
In Review with primary reviewer, not yet ready for team's eyes
label
Jun 26, 2024
nbbeeken
approved these changes
Jun 26, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
nbbeeken
added
Team Review
Needs review from team
and removed
Primary Review
In Review with primary reviewer, not yet ready for team's eyes
labels
Jun 26, 2024
nbbeeken
changed the title
refactor(NODE-6230): Refactor executeOperation to use iterative retry mechanism
refactor(NODE-6230): executeOperation to use iterative retry mechanism
Jun 27, 2024
W-A-James
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 2, 2024
5 tasks
W-A-James
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 8, 2024
nbbeeken
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 11, 2024
nbbeeken
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 22, 2024
nbbeeken
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 22, 2024
nbbeeken
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 13, 2024
nbbeeken
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 20, 2024
nbbeeken
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 21, 2024
nbbeeken
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 12, 2024
nbbeeken
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 25, 2024
nbbeeken
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 27, 2024
baileympearson
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 1, 2024
baileympearson
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 1, 2024
baileympearson
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 10, 2024
nbbeeken
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 14, 2024
baileympearson
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 21, 2024
nbbeeken
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 1, 2024
nbbeeken
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 5, 2024
dariakp
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 6, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
What is changing?
executeOperation
to use iterative retry mechanismretryOperation
helper function withexecuteOperationWithRetry
helper functionAbstractOperation
'scanRetryWrite
andcanRetryRead
getter methods to use opeation aspects as source of truth for retryability instead of defaulting totrue
for both (note that these values are being relied upon inexecuteOperation
in a different manner than prior to the refactor so the inconsistency that existed prior did not affect correctness before, but had to be updated to ensure correctness here)CommandOperation
'scanRetryWrite
getter to fallback on the parent class' value ofcanRetryWrite
Is there new documentation needed for these changes?
What is the motivation for this change?
NODE-6230
Release Highlight
Double check the following
npm run check:lint
scripttype(NODE-xxxx)[!]: description
feat(NODE-1234)!: rewriting everything in coffeescript