Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

test(NODE-6120): Implement Unified test runner changes for CSOT #4121

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 10, 2024
Merged

test(NODE-6120): Implement Unified test runner changes for CSOT #4121

merged 2 commits into from
Jun 10, 2024

Conversation

W-A-James
Copy link
Contributor

@W-A-James W-A-James commented May 24, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Description

What is changing?

Is there new documentation needed for these changes?

No

What is the motivation for this change?

Release Highlight

Double check the following

  • Ran npm run check:lint script
  • Self-review completed using the steps outlined here
  • PR title follows the correct format: type(NODE-xxxx)[!]: description
    • Example: feat(NODE-1234)!: rewriting everything in coffeescript
  • Changes are covered by tests
  • New TODOs have a related JIRA ticket

@W-A-James W-A-James changed the title implement spec runner changes test(NODE-6120): implement spec runner changes May 24, 2024
@W-A-James W-A-James changed the title test(NODE-6120): implement spec runner changes test(NODE-6120): implement Unified test runner changes for CSOT May 24, 2024
@W-A-James W-A-James changed the title test(NODE-6120): implement Unified test runner changes for CSOT test(NODE-6120): Implement Unified test runner changes for CSOT May 24, 2024
@W-A-James W-A-James marked this pull request as ready for review May 24, 2024 19:47
@durran durran self-assigned this May 29, 2024
@durran durran added the Primary Review In Review with primary reviewer, not yet ready for team's eyes label May 29, 2024
@durran durran added Team Review Needs review from team and removed Primary Review In Review with primary reviewer, not yet ready for team's eyes labels May 31, 2024
@W-A-James W-A-James force-pushed the NODE-6090 branch 3 times, most recently from e3b7a63 to 61564cd Compare June 5, 2024 15:30
@W-A-James
Copy link
Contributor Author

Heads up, rebasing onto the updated feature branch, so hold off on merging. Will update once done

@W-A-James
Copy link
Contributor Author

Rebase complete

@durran durran merged commit 72dc791 into NODE-6090 Jun 10, 2024
19 of 26 checks passed
@durran durran deleted the NODE-6120 branch June 10, 2024 14:46
baileympearson pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 21, 2024
@W-A-James @baileympearson
test(NODE-6120): Implement Unified test runner changes for CSOT (#4121)
ac57bea
W-A-James added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 8, 2024
@W-A-James
test(NODE-6120): Implement Unified test runner changes for CSOT (#4121)
9e1d550
nbbeeken pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 22, 2024
@W-A-James @nbbeeken
test(NODE-6120): Implement Unified test runner changes for CSOT (#4121)
aff679c
nbbeeken pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 22, 2024
@W-A-James @nbbeeken
test(NODE-6120): Implement Unified test runner changes for CSOT (#4121)
7b4a1fb
nbbeeken pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 13, 2024
@W-A-James @nbbeeken
test(NODE-6120): Implement Unified test runner changes for CSOT (#4121)
dd40ca0
nbbeeken pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 20, 2024
@W-A-James @nbbeeken
test(NODE-6120): Implement Unified test runner changes for CSOT (#4121)
937026b
nbbeeken pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 21, 2024
@W-A-James @nbbeeken
test(NODE-6120): Implement Unified test runner changes for CSOT (#4121)
7d65aae
nbbeeken pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 12, 2024
@W-A-James @nbbeeken
test(NODE-6120): Implement Unified test runner changes for CSOT (#4121)
909578f
nbbeeken pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 25, 2024
@W-A-James @nbbeeken
test(NODE-6120): Implement Unified test runner changes for CSOT (#4121)
0355404
nbbeeken pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2024
@W-A-James @nbbeeken
test(NODE-6120): Implement Unified test runner changes for CSOT (#4121)
542d016
baileympearson pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 1, 2024
@W-A-James @baileympearson
test(NODE-6120): Implement Unified test runner changes for CSOT (#4121)
51a3ad7
baileympearson pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 1, 2024
@W-A-James @baileympearson
test(NODE-6120): Implement Unified test runner changes for CSOT (#4121)
a216ae6
baileympearson pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 10, 2024
@W-A-James @baileympearson
test(NODE-6120): Implement Unified test runner changes for CSOT (#4121)
ecaedfa
nbbeeken pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 14, 2024
@W-A-James @nbbeeken
test(NODE-6120): Implement Unified test runner changes for CSOT (#4121)
a1206a0
baileympearson pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2024
@W-A-James @baileympearson
test(NODE-6120): Implement Unified test runner changes for CSOT (#4121)
426d698
nbbeeken pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 1, 2024
@W-A-James @nbbeeken
test(NODE-6120): Implement Unified test runner changes for CSOT (#4121)
5a754d1
nbbeeken pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 5, 2024
@W-A-James @nbbeeken
test(NODE-6120): Implement Unified test runner changes for CSOT (#4121)
1dfabeb
dariakp pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 6, 2024
@W-A-James @dariakp
test(NODE-6120): Implement Unified test runner changes for CSOT (#4121)
00a098a
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@baileympearson baileympearson baileympearson approved these changes

@durran durran durran approved these changes

Assignees

@durran durran

Labels
Team Review Needs review from team
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@W-A-James @durran @baileympearson