Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
GODRIVER-1925 Surface cursor errors in DownloadStream fillBuffer #653
GODRIVER-1925 Surface cursor errors in DownloadStream fillBuffer #653
Changes from 1 commit
4d24493
297a5b9
53ebe95
9e85019
d114af5
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
IIUC the test itself won't send a
getMore
. It should fail on the first iteration of the cursor.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah you're right. Previously I was using a
failpoint
ongetMore
, but the timeout error just comes from iterating the cursor. Changed.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you parameterize this test case, or add a test for
Skip
as well? This reminded me about GODRIVER-1806, and howRead
andSkip
are near duplicates, butSkip
avoids extra copies.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah great catch.
Read
andSkip
both callfillBuffer
, where the bug in error surfacing was. Added a different test case forSkip
(wasn't sure how to parameterize givenSkip
andRead
have different function signatures).