fix: support canonical module

[JacobLey]

Description of the Change

Handle canonicalizing Module, prevent implicit stringification failures

Alternate Designs

• Have canonicalType return 'object' for modules (not chosen as that could be breaking, not sure...)
• Have 'module' fallthrough to 'object' with no custom logic (not chosen so we can indicate different between "object" and "module")

Why should this be in core?

Current module canonicalization is broken, see #4887

Benefits

Tests can properly handle errors with a Module inside

Possible Drawbacks

Small chance there is some internal/custom handling expecting canonicalization of modules to fail... Seems unlikely?

Applicable issues

Fixes #4887

Bug fix, patch release

[linux-foundation-easycla]

The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

• ✅ login: JacobLey / name: Jacob Ley (1660462, 0264c7f)

[coveralls]

Coverage increased (+0.005%) to 94.332% when pulling 0264c7f on JacobLey:canonicalModule into 023f548 on mochajs:master.

[github-actions]

This PR hasn't had any recent activity, and I'm labeling it stale. Remove the label or comment or this PR will be closed in 14 days. Thanks for contributing to Mocha!

[JacobLey]

Still an active issue

[github-actions]

This PR hasn't had any recent activity, and I'm labeling it stale. Remove the label or comment or this PR will be closed in 14 days. Thanks for contributing to Mocha!

[JacobLey]

Bump

[github-actions]

This PR hasn't had any recent activity, and I'm labeling it stale. Remove the label or comment or this PR will be closed in 14 days. Thanks for contributing to Mocha!

[JoshuaKGoldberg]

👋 coming back to this @JacobLey, are you still interested in working on this PR? As of #5027 there are maintainers who can review it now. No worries if you no longer have time - but if you do that'd be great!

[JacobLey]

Sure, from what I can tell the commit is easily merged with latest mainline, and the solution should still be the same.

I have updated the branch, but don't believe I have power to re-open this PR.

Opened a new PR with the same commits (rebased off master): #5040