-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add ability to run tests in a mocha instance multiple times #4234
Merged
Merged
Changes from 17 commits
Commits
Show all changes
19 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
3a58213
Add ability to run tests in a mocha instance multiple times
nicojs 89279b9
Rename `autoDispsoe` to `cleanReferencesAfterRun`,
nicojs 077560b
Allow `unloadFiles` to reset `referencesCleaned`.
nicojs 2784791
Complete rename of _cleanReferencesAfterRun
nicojs b16def0
Add integration test for running a suite multiple times
nicojs 201bd80
improve api docs
nicojs 184911c
Docs: fix dead link
nicojs e21359e
Make sure tests run on older node versions
nicojs b2903db
Remove `.only` 😅
nicojs e6d1a10
Implement `process.listenerCount` in the browser
nicojs ae8b458
Implement mocha states in a finite state machine
nicojs 87e9f94
Fix some small remarks
nicojs ed82346
Make integration tests more damp
nicojs 7d55b7a
Keep `Runner` api backward compatible
nicojs cfb06e0
Unload files when disposed
nicojs 9bbb7a7
Runnable.reset should also reset `err` and `state`
nicojs fba0182
Also reset hooks
nicojs f3f82c2
Merge branch 'master' into feat/hot-reload
boneskull 3eb8ac1
Merge branch 'master' into feat/hot-reload
nicojs File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
NOTE: this is an observation and not a request for changes.
I don't love how
process
is shimmed here. we might be able to get away with changing the prototype to theEventEmitter
shim (loaded via browserify via events, becauseprocess
should be anEventEmitter
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah I was surprised that that wasn't yet the case.