-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 46
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[SD][v4.0] RCPs to use num of samples instead iterations #357
[SD][v4.0] RCPs to use num of samples instead iterations #357
Conversation
MLCommons CLA bot All contributors have signed the MLCommons CLA ✍️ ✅ |
1957232
to
6328dfc
Compare
@hiwotadese |
6328dfc
to
1e848cf
Compare
@@ -178,6 +178,7 @@ | |||
FIRST_EPOCH_NUM = "first_epoch_num" | |||
STATUS = "status" | |||
STEP_NUM = "step_num" | |||
SAMPLES_COUNT = "samples_count" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Wouldn't SAMPLES_NUM be more consistent with EPOCH_NUM and STEP_NUM? I know it's probably more accurate to call it COUNT. Not sure what matters more
Hi @nv-rborkar , can we merge this? |
This PR should address #351
Another PR to update the benchmark code will be opened in the training repo