Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[SD][v4.0] RCPs to use num of samples instead iterations #357

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 14, 2024

Conversation

ahmadki
Copy link
Contributor

@ahmadki ahmadki commented Jan 31, 2024

This PR should address #351
Another PR to update the benchmark code will be opened in the training repo

@ahmadki ahmadki requested review from a team as code owners January 31, 2024 11:16
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 31, 2024

MLCommons CLA bot All contributors have signed the MLCommons CLA ✍️ ✅

@ahmadki ahmadki force-pushed the ahmadki/sd_iters_to_samples branch 3 times, most recently from 1957232 to 6328dfc Compare February 12, 2024 23:29
@ahmadki ahmadki changed the title WIP: [SD][v4.0] RCPs to use num of samples instead iterations [SD][v4.0] RCPs to use num of samples instead iterations Feb 12, 2024
hiwotadese
hiwotadese previously approved these changes Feb 22, 2024
@ahmadki ahmadki changed the title [SD][v4.0] RCPs to use num of samples instead iterations WIP: [SD][v4.0] RCPs to use num of samples instead iterations Feb 22, 2024
@ahmadki
Copy link
Contributor Author

ahmadki commented Feb 22, 2024

@hiwotadese
Re-tagging as WIP, sorry. I'm trying to simplify the SD compliance checker - ETA is couple of hours.

@ahmadki ahmadki force-pushed the ahmadki/sd_iters_to_samples branch from 6328dfc to 1e848cf Compare February 25, 2024 23:31
@ahmadki ahmadki changed the title WIP: [SD][v4.0] RCPs to use num of samples instead iterations [SD][v4.0] RCPs to use num of samples instead iterations Feb 25, 2024
@@ -178,6 +178,7 @@
FIRST_EPOCH_NUM = "first_epoch_num"
STATUS = "status"
STEP_NUM = "step_num"
SAMPLES_COUNT = "samples_count"
Copy link
Contributor

@mmarcinkiewicz mmarcinkiewicz Feb 29, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Wouldn't SAMPLES_NUM be more consistent with EPOCH_NUM and STEP_NUM? I know it's probably more accurate to call it COUNT. Not sure what matters more

@mmarcinkiewicz
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @nv-rborkar , can we merge this?

@hiwotadese hiwotadese merged commit 99ba37a into mlcommons:master Mar 14, 2024
1 check passed
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 14, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants