Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Upgrade jest from 25.2.7 to 25.3.0 #10

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 1, 2020

Conversation

snyk-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@snyk-bot snyk-bot commented May 1, 2020

Snyk has created this PR to upgrade jest from 25.2.7 to 25.3.0.

ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.
  • The recommended version is 1 version ahead of your current version.
  • The recommended version was released 23 days ago, on 2020-04-08.
Release notes
Package name: jest
  • 25.3.0 - 2020-04-08

    Features

    • [babel-jest] Support passing supportsDynamicImport and supportsStaticESM (#9766)
    • [babel-preset-jest] Enable all syntax plugins not enabled by default that works on current version of Node (#9774)
    • [jest-circus] Enable writing async test event handlers (#9397)
    • [jest-runtime, @jest/transformer] Support passing supportsDynamicImport and supportsStaticESM (#9597)

    Chore & Maintenance

    • [*] Replace anys with unknowns (#9626)
    • [@jest/transform] Expose type CacheKeyOptions for getCacheKey (#9762)
    • [@jest/types] Correct type testRegex for ProjectConfig (#9780)
  • 25.2.7 - 2020-04-03

    Fixes

    • [jest-matcher-utils] Replace accessors with values to avoid calling setters in object descriptors when computing diffs for error reporting (#9757)
    • [@jest/watcher] Correct return type of shouldRunTestSuite for JestHookEmitter (#9753)
from jest GitHub release notes
Commit messages
Package name: jest
  • 45a4936 v25.3.0
  • d287ec3 chore: update changelog for release
  • c7f9080 chore(jest-types): correct type testRegex for ProjectConfig (#9780)
  • 222565a feat(circus): enable writing async test event handlers (#9397)
  • 44a960d feat: enable all babel syntax plugins (#9774)
  • 2edd5c4 chore: add helper for getting Jest's config in e2e tests (#9770)
  • edf8c0a feat: pass ESM options to transformers (#9597)
  • 8b8f90a chore: replace `any`s with `unknown`s (#9626)
  • bb720d2 feat: pass ESM options to Babel (#9766)
  • 8aea972 chore(website): add copy button the code blocks (#9750)
  • 7e5e422 chore: bump istanbul-reports for new uncovered lines design (#9758)
  • fb9e6a3 chore: correct CHANGELOG.md (#9763)
  • 9f7fa46 chore(jest-types): expose type `CacheKeyOptions` for `getCacheK… (#9762)
  • f9bb4b8 docs: Fix simple typo, seperated -> separated (#9760)

Compare


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:

🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust upgrade PR settings

🔕 Ignore this dependency or unsubscribe from future upgrade PRs

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 1, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #10 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master       #10   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            1         1           
  Lines           16        16           
=========================================
  Hits            16        16           
Flag Coverage Δ
#unittests 100.00% <ø> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 2876624...72eccd3. Read the comment docs.

@mkai mkai merged commit 81aa12b into master May 1, 2020
@mkai mkai deleted the snyk-upgrade-0204000f26179561afbb0910a232d1ff branch May 1, 2020 06:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants