feat(ci): add eslint rule prefer-template #12889
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Due to the fact that our CO's are stringly typed, a lot of
accesses to CO's from javascript need to assemble the CO's
key or group from other components. In Mixxx 2.4, the QJSEngine-
based controler engine allows us to use ES6
string-template-literals (eg `[EffectRack1_EffectUnit${n}_Effect${m}]`
which make these assembled strings
a lot easier to read than compared to the same string assembled
using string-concatination
("[EffectRack1_EffectUnit" + n + "_Effect" + m + "]").
|
Thank you |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Due to the fact that our CO's are stringly typed, a lot of accesses to CO's from javascript need to assemble the CO's key or group from other components. In Mixxx 2.4, the QJSEngine- based controler engine allows us to use ES6 string-template-literals (eg `[EffectRack1_EffectUnit${n}_Effect${m}]` which make these assembled strings a lot easier to read than compared to the same string assembled using string-concatination
("[EffectRack1_EffectUnit" + n + "_Effect" + m + "]").