Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Scheduler p_item data deduplication #2649

Closed

Conversation

jpbruinsslot
Copy link
Contributor

@jpbruinsslot jpbruinsslot commented Mar 14, 2024

TODO

  • Continue with removing TaskSchedule
  • Write migrations
  • Test relationship Task <-> PrioritizedItem storage
  • Refactor schedulers

@jpbruinsslot jpbruinsslot added the mula Issues related to the scheduler label Mar 14, 2024
@jpbruinsslot jpbruinsslot self-assigned this Mar 14, 2024
@jpbruinsslot jpbruinsslot changed the base branch from main to feature/mula/flexible-scheduling March 14, 2024 14:36
@underdarknl
Copy link
Contributor

I also notices the boefje and normalizer meta's are different, only the boefje has an organization member. Could you also make that more aligned?

This was unlinked from issues Apr 4, 2024
@jpbruinsslot jpbruinsslot deleted the feature/mula/p_item-table branch July 23, 2024 09:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
mula Issues related to the scheduler
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants