Hard fork tryout: better PoW encapsulation in block header #1478
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Will it also add the scaling factor for secondary PoW? |
|
Just add it and keep it unused for now? Wasn't planning on adding seconday PoW validation, factor adjustment, etc |
|
Yep; just add "for future use". Makes hard-fork slightly more interesting due to change in header size. |
|
Alright then, I'll add that up. |
|
Ready for review from whoever wants to. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Introducing a struct to encapsulate all PoW fields. This has the effect to reorder block header fields.