You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hrm, the common thing here is blosc, but in the CLI it was kinda expected since I know the cause, #160 but here I'm less certain. Especially since it's flaky.
Maybe some misuse of the blosc2 context/session thingy. I'm sorta tempted to take it out at this point until I have time to test/develop it better. However, being it's part of the experimental module I think this is okay now that I write this. By using that I think people are willfully opting into dragons. What do you think?
Hrm, the common thing here is blosc, but in the CLI it was kinda expected since I know the cause, #160 but here I'm less certain. Especially since it's flaky.
Maybe some misuse of the blosc2 context/session thingy. I'm sorta tempted to take it out at this point until I have time to test/develop it better. However, being it's part of the experimental module I think this is okay now that I write this. By using that I think people are willfully opting into dragons. What do you think?
The fact that blosc2 is in the experimental module is my justification for skipping the variant tests involving blosc2 and going ahead with shipping python-cramjam-2.9.0 and rust-libcramjam-0.6 (for which the C-API shared library doesn’t yet have any blosc2 functions) in Fedora. I don’t love the idea of shipping something with known memory-safety issues, but I agree that having it clearly marked experimental does help a lot.
In a build for Fedora Rawhide, I instead hit
This was on
x86_64
only; other architectures succeeded. I’ve also had builds succeed, so it seems like this is “flaky” in practice.This is probably related to cramjam/cramjam-cli#2 (comment), since I’ve only seen segmentation faults including
blosc2
support.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: