Addition of initial 1.2 schema with 'Portable' installerType #1930
Conversation
|
Looks like you forgot to add the schemas to the collection In reply to: 1036735881 |
| "type": [ "array", "null" ], | ||
| "items": { | ||
| "type": "object", | ||
| "properties": { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I know this is the "initial" schema, but any chance we could get the architecture key for PackageDependencies here per #1665?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@jedieaston I've run into a couple of cases where the dependencies aren't "natively" available for the architecture of the package. What would the intent be here? An optional "dependencyArchitecture" where the dependency needs to be other than the architecture of the installer? That's my best guess from reading #1665 and what I think I ran into trying to get Screen To Gif installed on ARM64.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
That would be my thinking. Many times installers are one architecture, but they rely on dependencies for a different architecture. I've seen lots of applications where they are x64 but for whatever reason they require x86 versions of the VC Redists.
ryfu-msft
changed the title
Changes:
Tests:
Microsoft Reviewers: Open in CodeFlow