Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support other data types for DataViewer #5093

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Apr 3, 2019
Merged

Conversation

rchiodo
Copy link

@rchiodo rchiodo commented Apr 3, 2019

For #4677

Add code for other data types
Add new functional tests for those data types

  • Pull request represents a single change (i.e. not fixing disparate/unrelated things in a single PR)
  • Title summarizes what is changing
  • Has a news entry file (remember to thank yourself!)
  • Has sufficient logging.
  • Has telemetry for enhancements.
  • Unit tests & system/integration tests are added/updated
  • Test plan is updated as appropriate
  • package-lock.json has been regenerated by running npm install (if dependencies have changed)
  • The wiki is updated with any design decisions/details.

@rchiodo rchiodo self-assigned this Apr 3, 2019
@rchiodo rchiodo requested a review from IanMatthewHuff April 3, 2019 00:40
export const noRowsInDataViewer = localize('DataScience.noRowsInDataViewer', 'Fetching data ...');
export const pandasTooOldForViewingFormat = localize('DataScience.pandasTooOldForViewingFormat', 'Python package \'pandas\' is version {0}. Version 0.20 or greater is required for viewing data.');
export const pandasRequiredForViewing = localize('DataScience.pandasRequiredForViewing', 'Python package \'pandas\' is required for viewing data.');
export const valuesColumn = localize('DataScience.valuesColumn', 'values');
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

missing in the nls.json

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Or actually looks like you are just using as a constant. Just a constant then?


In reply to: 271822249 [](ancestors = 271822249)

Copy link
Member

@IanMatthewHuff IanMatthewHuff left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:shipit:

@rchiodo rchiodo merged commit 56d44da into master Apr 3, 2019
@rchiodo rchiodo deleted the rchiodo/other_data_types branch April 3, 2019 23:50
@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 30, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants