Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[zeromq] Updated to the released 4.3.5 version. #36194

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jan 17, 2024

Conversation

bytebunny
Copy link
Contributor

This PR updates the ZeroMQ port to point to the released 4.3.5 version.
The current port for ZeroMQ (libzmq) points to a non-release commit that still reports to have version 4.3.5. It seems the version of libzmq was already incremented to 4.3.5, although it was not the final version for that release. Therefore, it is deceiving for the package consumers because calling find_package() in CMake will set ${ZeroMQ_VERSION} to 4.3.5, while the installed version will differ from the one released under the tag 4.3.5, see https://github.com/zeromq/libzmq/releases/tag/v4.3.5.

  • Changes comply with the maintainer guide
  • SHA512s are updated for each updated download
  • The "supports" clause reflects platforms that may be fixed by this new version
  • Any fixed CI baseline entries are removed from that file.
  • Any patches that are no longer applied are deleted from the port's directory.
  • The version database is fixed by rerunning ./vcpkg x-add-version --all and committing the result.
  • Only one version is added to each modified port's versions file.

@bytebunny
Copy link
Contributor Author

@microsoft-github-policy-service agree

@Cheney-W Cheney-W added the category:port-update The issue is with a library, which is requesting update new revision label Jan 16, 2024
@Cheney-W Cheney-W changed the title Updated the port for ZeroMQ to the released 4.3.5 version. [zeromq] Updated to the released 4.3.5 version. Jan 16, 2024
ports/zeromq/vcpkg.json Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@Cheney-W Cheney-W marked this pull request as draft January 16, 2024 09:53
@bytebunny bytebunny marked this pull request as ready for review January 16, 2024 10:53
@bytebunny bytebunny marked this pull request as draft January 16, 2024 12:51
@bytebunny bytebunny marked this pull request as ready for review January 16, 2024 13:24
@Cheney-W Cheney-W added the info:reviewed Pull Request changes follow basic guidelines label Jan 17, 2024
@JavierMatosD JavierMatosD merged commit df2f1a4 into microsoft:master Jan 17, 2024
15 checks passed
Osyotr pushed a commit to Osyotr/vcpkg that referenced this pull request Jan 23, 2024
* Updated the port for ZeroMQ to the released 4.3.5 version.

* Corrected port version and updated baseline file.

* Updated git-tree object id for zeromq port v4.3.5#0

* Update ports/zeromq/portfile.cmake

Co-authored-by: Cheney Wang <[email protected]>

* Update ports/zeromq/vcpkg.json

Co-authored-by: Cheney Wang <[email protected]>

* Updated the version metadata file for ZeroMQ port again.

---------

Co-authored-by: Rostyslav Skrypnyk <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Cheney Wang <[email protected]>
TomKatom pushed a commit to TomKatom/vcpkg that referenced this pull request Feb 23, 2024
* Updated the port for ZeroMQ to the released 4.3.5 version.

* Corrected port version and updated baseline file.

* Updated git-tree object id for zeromq port v4.3.5#0

* Update ports/zeromq/portfile.cmake

Co-authored-by: Cheney Wang <[email protected]>

* Update ports/zeromq/vcpkg.json

Co-authored-by: Cheney Wang <[email protected]>

* Updated the version metadata file for ZeroMQ port again.

---------

Co-authored-by: Rostyslav Skrypnyk <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Cheney Wang <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
category:port-update The issue is with a library, which is requesting update new revision info:reviewed Pull Request changes follow basic guidelines
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants