Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[cgns] add missing dependencies #28408

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 19, 2022
Merged

[cgns] add missing dependencies #28408

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 19, 2022

Conversation

autoantwort
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions[bot]
github-actions bot previously approved these changes Dec 18, 2022
View reviewed changes
@autoantwort autoantwort force-pushed the cgns-add-dependencies branch from 15c07d1 to 621f085 Compare December 18, 2022 22:52
@JonLiu1993 JonLiu1993 self-assigned this Dec 19, 2022
@JonLiu1993 JonLiu1993 added category:port-feature The issue is with a library, which is requesting new capabilities that didn’t exist category:port-bug The issue is with a library, which is something the port should already support and removed category:port-feature The issue is with a library, which is requesting new capabilities that didn’t exist labels Dec 19, 2022
@JonLiu1993 JonLiu1993 added the info:reviewed Pull Request changes follow basic guidelines label Dec 19, 2022
@JavierMatosD
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you!

@JavierMatosD JavierMatosD merged commit fe6e7f7 into microsoft:master Dec 19, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@Neumann-A Neumann-A Neumann-A left review comments

@JonLiu1993 JonLiu1993 JonLiu1993 approved these changes

@github-actions github-actions[bot] github-actions[bot] approved these changes

Assignees

@JonLiu1993 JonLiu1993

Labels
category:port-bug The issue is with a library, which is something the port should already support info:reviewed Pull Request changes follow basic guidelines
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@autoantwort @JavierMatosD @Neumann-A @JonLiu1993