Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

http-client-java, fix client accessor method parameter description #5313

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 10, 2024

Conversation

XiaofeiCao
Copy link
Member

@XiaofeiCao XiaofeiCao commented Dec 10, 2024

fix autorest CI: https://dev.azure.com/azure-sdk/internal/_build/results?buildId=4395471&view=logs&j=ca395085-040a-526b-2ce8-bdc85f692774&t=0750e130-1e9a-5b8a-35b2-9986f25ac898

Similar to client method parameter, assign a default parameter description if not exists.

@microsoft-github-policy-service microsoft-github-policy-service bot added the emitter:client:java Issue for the Java client emitter: @typespec/http-client-java label Dec 10, 2024
@azure-sdk
Copy link
Collaborator

No changes needing a change description found.

@XiaofeiCao XiaofeiCao changed the title http-client-java, fix client accessor method parameter name http-client-java, fix client accessor method parameter description Dec 10, 2024
@azure-sdk
Copy link
Collaborator

You can try these changes here

🛝 Playground 🌐 Website 📚 Next docs

@XiaofeiCao XiaofeiCao marked this pull request as ready for review December 10, 2024 02:49
@XiaofeiCao XiaofeiCao added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 10, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit 8919ac8 Dec 10, 2024
25 checks passed
@XiaofeiCao XiaofeiCao deleted the java_fix_client_accessor_method_parameter_name branch December 10, 2024 03:34
archerzz pushed a commit to archerzz/typespec that referenced this pull request Dec 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
emitter:client:java Issue for the Java client emitter: @typespec/http-client-java
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants