[rush] Exposing executionRecords in PhasedScriptsAction allows users to observe the execution process

[sherlockfeng]

Summary

Exposing executionRecords in PhasedScriptsAction allows users to observe the execution process

Details

As a member of the monorepo infrastructure team, there will be many compilations in progress at the same time,
I hope to be able to collect the real-time status of the rush execution command. If I can get the real-time status in the hooks of rushLifeCycle, I can observe the start and end times of all project compilation in a task, and then send it to the data server to build a dashboard that can view the execution status in real time

How to use

rushSession.hooks.runAnyPhasedCommand.tap(PLUGIN_NAME, (phase: ReadonlyMap<Operation, IOperationExecutionResult>) => {
    phase.hooks.beforeExecuteOperations.tapPromise(PLUGIN_NAME, async (records) => {
        // all operation records
    });
    phase.hooks.onOperationStatusChanged.tap(PLUGIN_NAME, (record: IOperationExecutionResult) => {
        // statue changed operation record
    });
});

Demo use local data

[dmichon-msft]

I needed a way to expose this data in #3651 as well, and at the time it seemed more useful to add an additional hook to PhasedOperationHooks that gets invoked whenever the state of an individual operation changes, rather than having to poll the execution. See these callbacks here: https://github.com/microsoft/rushstack/pull/3651/files#diff-454747232f90e3a30fe693116f4913b6ca94cdbe7e9eb5b4a94e744b69fc6c3dR25-R26

I'd prefer not to add additional API surface to the PhasedScriptAction class and have any extensibility mechanisms be via the PhasedOperationHooks object for consistency.

[dmichon-msft]

Let's avoid floating promise issues. Either await async hooks or use sync hooks, depending on if it makes sense for the given hook to potentially modify state.

Edit: otherwise, looks about ready.

[dmichon-msft]

LGTM